CRAI - Universidad del Rosario Koha › Detalles de: The politics of evidence-based policy making

The politics of evidence-based policy making

por Cairney, Paul

Publicado por : Palgrave macmillan (Londres (Inglaterra)) Detalles físicos: 137 páginas ilustraciones ISBN:9781137517814; 9781137517807.

Tema(s): Ciencia política | Planificación política | Relaciones públicas y política | Técnicas de decisión en política | Ciencia política

Año : 2016

Existencias ( 1 )
Notas de título ( 4 )

Tipo de ítem	Ubicación actual	Colección	Signatura	Copia número	Estado	Fecha de vencimiento	Código de barras	Reserva de ítems
Libro	Claustro 2do piso	Libro	320.6 C136p (Navegar estantería)	Ej.1	Disponible		100157244

Total de reservas: 0

Navegando Claustro Estantes, Ubicación: 2do piso Cerrar el navegador de estanterías

Previo								Siguiente
Previo	320.6 A545p Public policymaking an introduction	320.6 B518l L'évaluation des politiques publiques	320.6 B974 The politics of public sector reform	320.6 C136p The politics of evidence-based policy making	320.6 C244 The myth of the rational voter	320.6 C244 The myth of the rational voter	320.6 C663 Public policy perspectives y choices	Siguiente

Incluye referencias bibliográficas e índices

Chapter 1. The Science of Policy Making -- Chapter 2. The Role of Evidence in Theories of the Policy Process -- Chapter 3. Health and advocacy: what are the barriers to the use of evidence in policy? -- Chapter 4. Evidence in environmental policy: learning lessons from health? -- Chapter 5. Conclusion: How to Respond to The Limits of Evidence-Based Policy Making.

The Politics of Evidence Based Policymaking identifies how to work with policymakers to maximize the use of scientific evidence. Policymakers cannot consider all evidence relevant to policy problems. They use two shortcuts: 'rational' ways to gather enough evidence, and 'irrational' decision-making, drawing on emotions, beliefs, and habits. Most scientific studies focus on the former. They identify uncertainty when policymakers have incomplete evidence, and try to solve it by improving the supply of information. They do not respond to ambiguity, or the potential for policymakers to understand problems in very different ways. A good strategy requires advocates to be persuasive: forming coalitions with like-minded actors, and accompanying evidence with simple stories to exploit the emotional or ideological biases of policymakers.

Texto en inglés