000 02900cam a2200385 i 4500
001 18574454
005 20161122084240.0
008 161122s2015 xxu frb 001 0 eng d
010 _a 2014451857
015 _aGBB4D6917
_2bnb
016 7 _a016964401
_2Uk
020 _a9781137449962
020 _a1137449969
020 _a9781137480026
020 _a1137480025
035 _a(OCoLC)ocn885228588
040 _aCo-BoUCM
_bspa
_cSaul Niño
_dSaul Niño
041 0 _aeng
100 1 _aEl-Said, Hamed
_982013
245 1 0 _aNew approaches to countering terrorism
_bdesigning and evaluating counter radicalization and de-radicalization programs
_cHamed El-Said
246 1 _aDesigning and evaluating counter radicalization and de-radicalization programs
260 _aPortsmouth (New Hampshire, Estados Unidos)
_bPelgrave macmillan
_c2015
300 _a302 páginas
490 0 _aNew security challenges series
504 _aIncluye referencias bibliográficas e índices
505 0 _a1. Introduction -- 2. Counter De-Rad: Setting the Framework -- 3. Radicalization in a Western Context: The Case of Australia -- 4. Counter Radicalization and Deradicalization in a Western Context: The Case of Australia -- 5. Mauritania: From Toleration to Violent Islam -- 6. Singapore: Crisis of Identity, Shared Values and Religious Rehabilitation -- 7. Sudan: Deradicalization and Counter Radicalization in a Radicalizing Environment -- 8. From Militarization to Democratization: The Transformation of Turkey's Counter Terrorism Strategy -- 9. Conclusion and Some Remarks.
520 _aHamed El-Said investigates the emergence of new, 'soft' approaches to counter violent extremists, generally known as counter radicalization and deradicalization programmes (Counter-de-Rad). This is the first work to develop a holistic framework which will allow policy makers and practitioners to better understand conditions conducive to violent extremism, and to better design and effectively implement such programmes in the future. This book, supported and facilitated by a wealth of primary research and consideration of all stakeholders, addresses cultural and legal differences between countries while developing its holistic approach. In addition, the research focuses on and identifies conditions conducive to either the success or the failure of Counter-de-Rad programmes. Finally, it provides a new, broader approach to evaluate the performance of such programmes, one that goes beyond the current narrow models which treat recidivism rates as the main indicator of success or failure.
546 _aTexto en inglés
650 7 _aTerrorismo
_xPrevención
_925425
650 7 _aRadicalismo
_xPrevención
_923036
650 7 _aConflictos
_911577
690 0 _aCiencia política
_9340
942 _2DEWEY
_a6
_cLIBRORESER
_e1
_h363.32517
_mE491ne
999 _c305101
_d305101